Wednesday, November 25, 2009

The Calling of "Chocolat"

Chocolat is the perfect movie for the holiday season. It’s warm; it’s joyous; and it’s “sinfully delicious.” Through a “re-vision” of this amazing film, it is as much of a heart-warming movie as it is a feminist movie.



Chocolat features a young, independent mother, Vianne, who enters a small, conservative, and religious French town with her daughter, and she opens a chocolate store during Lent. The town mayor, Comte de Reynaud, is enraged by her actions and even fears her influence, because Vianne threatens to break his traditions. He is a strict man and wishes to rule the town with an iron fist. He has been successful until the presence of Vianne and her chocolate.

Vianne is a foreigner. She travels in a bright red cape in which her daughter also has. She follows to North Wind, and allows it to take her wherever it calls her to. She is not religious, because she does not believe in such restrictive rules. She is not married, and she has a daughter. Vianne stands for everything that the town is not.

This story reminds me of another tale - "The Women Men Don’t See” by Alice B. Sheldon (actual story provided.) Sheldon depicts a woman, Ruth Parson, who is traveling alone with her daughter, and the story tells that they have already been to a couple of places. Parson’s family does not involve men. Ruth’s mother raised her alone, and Ruth raised her daughter alone. Furthermore, Ruth and her daughter leave Earth together; if her daughter is with child, then her daughter will also raise that child alone.

For some unknown reason, all the women in the Parson family remain single, and the men’s only role is to provide the seed for the next generation. It is as if independence runs through the women’s veins. It is in their blood. Vianne comes from a similar culture where the women roam free to travel, to explore, to help, and to fight. Men are not involved. They follow the call of the North Wind.

Another interesting similarity is the influence of “Maya” culture. Ruth and her daughter traveled to many Maya sites and were supposed to be going to another, and her daughter is later involved briefly with the Mayan pilot. If you notice Vianne’s sign, it says “Chocolaterie Maya.” Her chocolates are based on the Mayan recipe.


However, unlike Ruth, Vianne is definitely “memorable.” The sidestories involve how Vianne helps different villagers. Most of them star a female character, rather than male character - an eldery woman with an equally strong spirit, a wife with an unpassionate spouse, a woman trapped with an abusive husband, and more.

Vianne and her chocolates are exotic with the power to "awaken the passion," and that is exactly why she is not to be accepted. The town’s people call her “some kind of a radical.” A child calls her “an atheist.” Although he does not know what that word means, the way he says it implies a strong, negative connotation as if Vianne is associated with the devil.

Needless to say, Vianne infuriates Comte de Reynaud. He calls her a “brazen” woman and fakes sympathy for her “illegitimate child.” He is threatened by her, because she “laughs” at the town’s, namely his, traditions. She wears vivid colors and has a signature red cape while the main colors of the town are grey, black, and white. Chocolate is sensual; not only that, Vianne’s chocolates are exotic. She is the embodiment of life and its sins.

This single woman represents a foreign power that this one man is afraid of. His world is changed, and not in the way that he wants. She is independent and will bow down to no man. He is terrified of her potential, yet he can do nothing to suppress her. He then tries to prevent the town’s people from further succumbing to her influence by calling her “satanic.” She is also immoral, for she associates herself with the gypsies who are boycotted for immorality. She is a black-hole to his universe.

Chocolat is a story of a woman’s mission to bring joy to a village that has long forgotten the meaning of happiness and the true meaning of life. Life is not all about strictly following rules and traditions. Life does not mean for one to be serious and solemn all the time. Life is about letting oneself go and remembering what little things make the heart beat and make the heart melt. Life is knowing how to give and accept kindness and care. Life is about the unrestrained expression of love.

Life is living with passion.

1 comment:

  1. After reading your post, I'm quite intrigued to read/see more about "Chocolat!" I like that there are many layers and angles to this story - religion vs. "paganism," men vs. women, pathos vs. logos.

    It is interesting how the church is portrayed by being about rigid rules, lifeless traditions, controlling, and powerful. Religion without its true purpose to have faith, will be empty and all about rigid traditions and power.I agree with the story that many people who grow up in Christianity probably do not know what they really believe in and why. Thus, they "forget" about the joys, passions, and live in fear, rather than faith. Religion becomes quite dangerous when people are all about fear, manipulation, and selfishness.

    However, from my own experience, I find that faith is not separate from my passions, joys, and taking risks (for faith, of course!). In Christianity, there are times to be joyful and times for mourning. Just because the setting for the "Chocolat" is during Lent - a time to be reverent by fasting and mournful of our transgressions, the season of Lent does not characterize the church to be this way all the time. In the end of Lent, there is celebration, as much as there is Christmas (as the two are related and not separate in the Christian faith). Though I do see the author's intent to contrast the two concepts of pathos and logos, Vianne just has bad timing. If she was truly sensitive to the community, couldn't she just put off opening the shop until the season of Lent is over? It would be as if you were mourning the death of a loved one at a funeral, then going to happy party right after (ok not the best example, but it's all I can think of right now.)

    Also, we should not live in either of the two extremes of pathos and logos as there is the need for both. If pathos existed without logos, life would be chaotic, without any sense of direction or organization, and totally spontaneous. If logos existed without pathos, it would be just about rules, logic, and facts. Life should be a combination of both as one needs the other. It's like playing (having fun) and doing work. If life was all about doing work, that's obviously really boring and purposeless; plus we'd be so unhappy! If life was all about play, it would get really boring too, because everything would get old, feel the same, and feel empty. We work to survive and to have fun. We have fun in order to relax and take a break from work. They should co-exist and balance in our lives.

    I hope I don't sound too harsh! I'm not trying to bash the movie or anything, I just wish the author/director would at least give the church some credit. I hope there is some redemption in the end! Now I'm curious about the ending and wonder what the outcome will be!

    ReplyDelete